Options

**Part 2 of 2: The Limitations of The Black Scholes Model (by Warren Buffett)**

**Chris Lee Susanto**, Founder at Re-ThinkWealth.com

24 October 2018

# This is the second of the two-part article series on The Black-Scholes model. In the first part, we had covered how we can use The Black-Scholes model to price options and in this second part, the limitations of the Black-Scholes Model (including Warren Buffett’s opinion on it).

# Summary

- The first limitation is that the original Black Scholes model does not take into account the dividends of stocks in valuing the options.
- The second limitation of the Black-Scholes model is one that is pointed out by a person I greatly admire, Warren Buffett himself. It got to do with the Black-Scholes limitations of valuing long-dated options.

# A Brief Recap of The Black-Scholes Model

Before we touch on the limitations of Black-Scholes by Warren Buffett, let’s do a brief recap. In the first part of the article, we talked about how the Black-Scholes model is used to price options. They are commonly known as the options pricing model to know the fair price of the put or call options. There are six variables that are taken into account in calculating the options value. The six variables are time to expiry, the underlying stock price at the time, volatility of the underlying stock, type of option, strike price and risk-free rate. So this means that the value derived using the Black-Scholes model got to do with the inputs that are being put into the model – pretty straightforward.

# Does the Black-Scholes Model Make Sense?

First, I believe that the Black-Scholes model makes good sense. Based on the formula of the model, it makes good sense that when the underlying price increases, the cheaper the options will be if it is a put option. And more expensive if it is a call option. So depending on whether you are a seller or a buyer of these options, the value of your options will increase or decrease accordingly.

For example, the buyer of the put options has the right to sell the stock at a predetermined strike price. If prices keep on going up, the put options contract logically become less of a value. Because why would the put options buyer want to sell its stocks at the lower strike price of the put options if selling at the market can fetch a higher price? And in this scenario, the seller of the put options who had received premiums/payments from the buyer of the put options will not need to be obliged to buy the stocks from the buyer of the put options. Hence, the put options become worthless on expiry if the price keeps on going up. Thus, put options value decreases when the underlying price of the stock keeps on going up.

Based on the formula of the model, it also makes good sense also that the greater the volatility, the higher the options price/value will be. Higher uncertainty will result in higher premiums due to higher perceived risks. It is the way it should be. It makes good sense too. Bonds by the government has less volatility so we are compensated lesser. As compared to if we invest in say stocks that have higher volatility and higher uncertainty.

# The Original Formula of the Black-Scholes Model

To recap, this is the original formula for Black-Scholes:

The original Black-Scholes formula takes into account the current stock price, time to expiry, options strike price, risk-free interest rate and the cumulative standard normal distribution which is known as the implied volatility or simply how volatile the stock is.

# The Limitations of the Original Black-Scholes Model (Dividends Not Accounted for)

Here is the first limitation that I came out with: The underlying price of a stock will usually decrease accordingly by the amount of cash dividend declared on the ex-dividend date of a company. So, dividends do play a role too because it affects the underlying price of a stock. But in the Black-Scholes model, it makes the assumptions that no dividends are paid out during the life of the options. This means that a company that pays a lot of dividends will usually have the stock price decrease in relation to it. If during the course of the options, the company pays those dividends, the put options should be worth more and the call options should be worth less. But the original Black-Scholes model does not take those into dividends into account – and we need to adjust it accordingly. We can do that by subtracting the present value of the upcoming dividends of the stock during the life of the options from the current stock price – in which we then input the subtracted value to the original Black-Scholes model.

# The Limitations of the Original Black-Scholes Model (by Warren Buffett)

The second limitation of the Black-Scholes model is one that is pointed out by a person I greatly admire, Warren Buffett himself. It got to do with the Black-Scholes limitations of valuing long-dated options.

Based on Warren Buffett, while the Black-Scholes model has been the widely used model to value equity put options, he thinks that there are limitations to it – when the model is applied to an extended time period, they can produce absurd results. So Waren Buffett is saying that the Black-Scholes model is bad at valuing long-dated options.

Warren Buffett also gives an example to explain this theory of his by pushing it to the extremes as you can see from the image screenshot above. He gave the example of selling a 100-year-old $1 billion put option on the S&P 500 at a strike price of 903 which was the index’s level on 31 December 2008. Using the “proper” Black-Scholes model at the time, he will get a premium of about $2.5 million. And he sees that the expected loss on the contract would be $5 million (by taking $1 billion which is the contract value of the options times a 1% chance that 100 years from now the S&P 500 is going to be worth less and times it by 50% which is the chance of that decline).

Using this example, Warren Buffett said that if he received the $2.5 million up front, he only need to invest and get 0.7% annually for the next 100 years to cover the expected loss. So he said that this is akin to borrowing the money which is $2.5 million for a rate of 0.7% annually. Even at a total loss of $1 billion, the “borrowing cost” will only be about 6.2%.

For Warren Buffett personally, he has made use of these kinds of market inefficiency to sell put options when the volatility is high so that he was able to get more premiums/cash flows. And then he uses these premiums/cash flows to invest and get returns.

“Our put contracts total $37.1 billion (at current exchange rates) and are spread among four major indices: the S&P 500 in the U.S., the FTSE 100 in the U.K., the Euro Stoxx 50 in Europe, and the Nikkei 225 in Japan. Our first contract comes due on September 9, 2019 and our last on January 24, 2028. We have received premiums of $4.9 billion, money we have invested. We, meanwhile, have paid nothing, since all expiration dates are far in the future. Nonetheless, we have used Black-Scholes valuation methods to record a yearend liability of $10 billion, an amount that will change on every reporting date. The two financial items – this estimated loss of $10 billion minus the $4.9 billion in premiums we have received – means that we have so far reported a mark-to-market loss of $5.1 billion from these contracts.” – Warren Buffett

While Warren is able to utilize the volatility of the stock market to get more premiums, he criticizes Black-Scholes as being limited simply because of the financial reporting regulation that forces him to use the Black-Scholes.

# Disclaimer:

The information provided is for general information purposes only and is not intended to be a personalized investment or financial advice.

**Important:** Please read our full disclaimer.

## Is Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW) Worth Investing? Here Are My 5 Takeaways

Snowflake does cloud computing that implements a variable pricing model, which can be at times more attractive than fixed packages offered by more prominent competitors. The market for […]

## Nasdaq Is Officially In A Correction Territory: What Is Next?

The adage that “In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” by Benjamin Graham could not be more true over the past few days. As of 9 September 2020, […]

## My 3 Thoughts on Yesterday’s Deepest US Market Decline Since June

Yesterday (3 September 2020), the US market had its deepest one day decline since June. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq had their deepest declines since June 11 and for Dow, it was their biggest decline since June 26 […]

## Will The Stock Market Crash One More Time in 2020?

My Bet: In 2020, The Stock Market Will Not Crash Again. Yes, it is hard to predict where the stock market is heading in the short term. But my bet with regards to virus-related concern is that I do not think that we will crash again back to March-April Lows in 2020 just because of it […]

## Is SIA Shares Worth Buying? Here Are My Thoughts (August 2020)

Think About How SIA Was When Times Was “Normal” Before we got into this COVID-19 mess, SIA is already not a great business to own even when times were “normal.” All of us know that the airline […]

## The Eight Accounting Fraud or Red Flag Signs To Look Out In Stocks

In this article, I’d like to share eight signs of potential fraud in our stocks portfolio that we should be careful of. These are eight simple potential warning signs of bad financial reporting or early markers […]

## My 5 Key Takeaway From AEM Holdings 1H 2020 Results

3. As of 1H20, Most Earnings Paid Out As Dividends Based on AEM 1H20 reports, their cumulative capital allocation breakdown from 2017 to 1H2020 is as follows: Dividends – 47%, Acquisitions – 25%, Capex – 18%, Buybacks – 10%. It is interesting to note that […]

## Kodak Stock is Up Over 1,400% in Two Days. Does It Make Sense?

Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK) opened at $2.15 (Monday) on July 27, 2020, and closed at $33.20 (Wednesday) by 29 July 2020. That is a 1,444.19% increase over a two day period. In this article, I am going to give you some background on the Kodak company, the reason […]

## Here Are 4 Reasons Why Intel Stock Plunged 16% Last Friday

Last Friday on 24 July 2020, Intel closed 16.24% down. Although I do not own any Intel stock, I was curious why it fell after releasing its Q2 2020 results. Just a while ago, I saw the news that after 15 years of partnership, Apple decided to break up with Intel and stop using its […]

## My 5 Key Takeaway From Temasek Portfolio Value in 2020

1. Temasek Portfolio is Huge. Although I know that Temasek has a huge portfolio, I was surprised to see that it is around the size of Warren Buffett’s. As of 31 March 2020, the net portfolio value or NPV is at S$306 billion. So we have our own Warren Buffett in Singapore, that is […]

## What I Learnt From Adam Smith About Investment and Money

Who is Adam Smith? Adam Smith (1723-1790) was a philosopher and economist who was best known for authoring the book An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Wealth of Nations also happens to be one of Warren Buffett’s favourite books […]

## A List of Value Investing Funds in Singapore and Outside of Singapore

As a value investor, as a practitioner of value investing, I am very interested in studying funds I view as an executioner of the various value investing methodologies I myself am very passionate about. In this article, I will list down some of the value investing funds in […]

## Wait, Wait!

I often share insights that I do not share in this blog over at my Facebook page. Don’t forget to like it before you go!

## Is Snowflake (NYSE: SNOW) Worth Investing? Here Are My 5 Takeaways

Snowflake does cloud computing that implements a variable pricing model, which can be at times more attractive than fixed packages offered by more prominent competitors. The market for […]

## Nasdaq Is Officially In A Correction Territory: What Is Next?

The adage that “In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.” by Benjamin Graham could not be more true over the past few days. As of 9 September 2020, […]

## My 3 Thoughts on Yesterday’s Deepest US Market Decline Since June

Yesterday (3 September 2020), the US market had its deepest one day decline since June. The S&P 500 and Nasdaq had their deepest declines since June 11 and for Dow, it was their biggest decline since June 26 […]

## Will The Stock Market Crash One More Time in 2020?

My Bet: In 2020, The Stock Market Will Not Crash Again. Yes, it is hard to predict where the stock market is heading in the short term. But my bet with regards to virus-related concern is that I do not think that we will crash again back to March-April Lows in 2020 just because of it […]

## Is SIA Shares Worth Buying? Here Are My Thoughts (August 2020)

Think About How SIA Was When Times Was “Normal” Before we got into this COVID-19 mess, SIA is already not a great business to own even when times were “normal.” All of us know that the airline […]

## The Eight Accounting Fraud or Red Flag Signs To Look Out In Stocks

In this article, I’d like to share eight signs of potential fraud in our stocks portfolio that we should be careful of. These are eight simple potential warning signs of bad financial reporting or early markers […]

## My 5 Key Takeaway From AEM Holdings 1H 2020 Results

3. As of 1H20, Most Earnings Paid Out As Dividends Based on AEM 1H20 reports, their cumulative capital allocation breakdown from 2017 to 1H2020 is as follows: Dividends – 47%, Acquisitions – 25%, Capex – 18%, Buybacks – 10%. It is interesting to note that […]

## Kodak Stock is Up Over 1,400% in Two Days. Does It Make Sense?

Eastman Kodak Company (NYSE: KODK) opened at $2.15 (Monday) on July 27, 2020, and closed at $33.20 (Wednesday) by 29 July 2020. That is a 1,444.19% increase over a two day period. In this article, I am going to give you some background on the Kodak company, the reason […]